Different plant materials as a supplemental source of smoking tinapa / Genica Ann V. Ricasata, Oscar P. Saqueton, and Jinecis T. Soberano.
Material type:
TextPublisher: Rosario, Cavite : Cavite State University-CCAT Campus, 2015Description: xi, 40 leaves : illustrations ; 28 cmLOC classification: UM | Summary: RICASATA, GENICA ANN V., SOBERANO, JINECIS T., and SAQUETON, OSCAR P., DIFFERENT PLANT MATERIALS AS AN SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE OF SMOKING TINAPA, Research Study, Secondary Education Laboratory High School, Cavite State University-Rosario. Adviser: Mrs. Caridad Merced.
The purpose of the study was to use Guava, Lemon grass, and Pandan as alternative sources of smoke for making Tinapa. This study determined if there was a significant difference between the commercial Saw Dust. Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa's acceptability ratings in terms of color, smell, and taste, and determined the most appropriate treatment among the four.
The study used the RCBD research design with two replications. It was conducted to enhance the quality of the commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and to determine the acceptability rating of commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon grass, and Pandan Tinapa. The study also aimed to determine the variance of color, smell, and taste of the products in different treatments.
Each treatment was smoked equally with the duration of one (1) hour consisting of the following sources of smoke, Saw Dust (T1), Guava Leaves (12), Lemon Grass (13); Pandan Leaves (T4).
To get the result of the study, the researchers used survey form, Tukey Test to determine the acceptance rate and One Way Anova to determine if there was a significant difference between commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa's acceptability rating in terms of color, smell, and taste.
Results showed that there was a significant difference in acceptability rating between commercial Saw Dust Tinapa, Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa in terms of taste, color, and smell. It shows that Lemon Grass Tinapa is more acceptable. Null hypothesis was rejected.
Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended to conduct further study on the chemical content of cartons and newspaper used as smoke materials by Tinapa producer and to find ways to avoid ignition of the guava leaves to minimize burning processed Tinapa.
| Item type | Current location | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thesis/Manuscripts/Dissertations
|
Cavite State University - CCAT Campus | Thesis/Manuscript/Dissertation | TH | 1 | Available | T00083 |
Undergraduate Research Paper (LSHS)--Cavite State University-CCAT Campus, 2015.
Includes bibliographical references and appendices.
RICASATA, GENICA ANN V., SOBERANO, JINECIS T., and SAQUETON, OSCAR P., DIFFERENT PLANT MATERIALS AS AN SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE OF SMOKING TINAPA, Research Study, Secondary Education Laboratory High School, Cavite State University-Rosario. Adviser: Mrs. Caridad Merced.
The purpose of the study was to use Guava, Lemon grass, and Pandan as alternative sources of smoke for making Tinapa. This study determined if there was a significant difference between the commercial Saw Dust. Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa's acceptability ratings in terms of color, smell, and taste, and determined the most appropriate treatment among the four.
The study used the RCBD research design with two replications. It was conducted to enhance the quality of the commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and to determine the acceptability rating of commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon grass, and Pandan Tinapa. The study also aimed to determine the variance of color, smell, and taste of the products in different treatments.
Each treatment was smoked equally with the duration of one (1) hour consisting of the following sources of smoke, Saw Dust (T1), Guava Leaves (12), Lemon Grass (13); Pandan Leaves (T4).
To get the result of the study, the researchers used survey form, Tukey Test to determine the acceptance rate and One Way Anova to determine if there was a significant difference between commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa's acceptability rating in terms of color, smell, and taste.
Results showed that there was a significant difference in acceptability rating between commercial Saw Dust Tinapa, Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa in terms of taste, color, and smell. It shows that Lemon Grass Tinapa is more acceptable. Null hypothesis was rejected.
Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended to conduct further study on the chemical content of cartons and newspaper used as smoke materials by Tinapa producer and to find ways to avoid ignition of the guava leaves to minimize burning processed Tinapa.
In English text.
There are no comments on this title.