Different plant materials as a supplemental source of smoking tinapa / (Record no. 3569)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03171nam a22002657a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20240601024039.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 240601b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Language of cataloging English.
Transcribing agency CvSU-CCAT Campus Library.
Description conventions rda.
050 ## - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER
Classification number UM
Item number
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Ricasata, Genica Ann V., author.
9 (RLIN) 13327
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Different plant materials as a supplemental source of smoking tinapa /
Statement of responsibility, etc. Genica Ann V. Ricasata, Oscar P. Saqueton, and Jinecis T. Soberano.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Rosario, Cavite :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Cavite State University-CCAT Campus,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2015.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent xi, 40 leaves :
Other physical details illustrations ;
Dimensions 28 cm
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Undergraduate Research Paper (LSHS)--Cavite State University-CCAT Campus, 2015.
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc. note Includes bibliographical references and appendices.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Thesis Abstract <a href="RICASATA, GENICA ANN V., SOBERANO, JINECIS T., and SAQUETON, OSCAR P., DIFFERENT PLANT MATERIALS AS AN SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE OF SMOKING TINAPA, Research Study, Secondary Education Laboratory High School, Cavite State University-Rosario. Adviser: Mrs. Caridad Merced.<br/><br/>The purpose of the study was to use Guava, Lemon grass, and Pandan as alternative sources of smoke for making Tinapa. This study determined if there was a significant difference between the commercial Saw Dust. Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa's acceptability ratings in terms of color, smell, and taste, and determined the most appropriate treatment among the four.<br/><br/>The study used the RCBD research design with two replications. It was conducted to enhance the quality of the commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and to determine the acceptability rating of commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon grass, and Pandan Tinapa. The study also aimed to determine the variance of color, smell, and taste of the products in different treatments.<br/><br/>Each treatment was smoked equally with the duration of one (1) hour consisting of the following sources of smoke, Saw Dust (T1), Guava Leaves (12), Lemon Grass (13); Pandan Leaves (T4).<br/><br/>To get the result of the study, the researchers used survey form, Tukey Test to determine the acceptance rate and One Way Anova to determine if there was a significant difference between commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa's acceptability rating in terms of color, smell, and taste.<br/><br/>Results showed that there was a significant difference in acceptability rating between commercial Saw Dust Tinapa, Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa in terms of taste, color, and smell. It shows that Lemon Grass Tinapa is more acceptable. Null hypothesis was rejected.<br/><br/>Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended to conduct further study on the chemical content of cartons and newspaper used as smoke materials by Tinapa producer and to find ways to avoid ignition of the guava leaves to minimize burning processed Tinapa.<br/>">RICASATA, GENICA ANN V., SOBERANO, JINECIS T., and SAQUETON, OSCAR P., DIFFERENT PLANT MATERIALS AS AN SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE OF SMOKING TINAPA, Research Study, Secondary Education Laboratory High School, Cavite State University-Rosario. Adviser: Mrs. Caridad Merced.<br/><br/>The purpose of the study was to use Guava, Lemon grass, and Pandan as alternative sources of smoke for making Tinapa. This study determined if there was a significant difference between the commercial Saw Dust. Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa's acceptability ratings in terms of color, smell, and taste, and determined the most appropriate treatment among the four.<br/><br/>The study used the RCBD research design with two replications. It was conducted to enhance the quality of the commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and to determine the acceptability rating of commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon grass, and Pandan Tinapa. The study also aimed to determine the variance of color, smell, and taste of the products in different treatments.<br/><br/>Each treatment was smoked equally with the duration of one (1) hour consisting of the following sources of smoke, Saw Dust (T1), Guava Leaves (12), Lemon Grass (13); Pandan Leaves (T4).<br/><br/>To get the result of the study, the researchers used survey form, Tukey Test to determine the acceptance rate and One Way Anova to determine if there was a significant difference between commercial Saw Dust Tinapa and the Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa's acceptability rating in terms of color, smell, and taste.<br/><br/>Results showed that there was a significant difference in acceptability rating between commercial Saw Dust Tinapa, Guava, Lemon Grass, and Pandan Tinapa in terms of taste, color, and smell. It shows that Lemon Grass Tinapa is more acceptable. Null hypothesis was rejected.<br/><br/>Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended to conduct further study on the chemical content of cartons and newspaper used as smoke materials by Tinapa producer and to find ways to avoid ignition of the guava leaves to minimize burning processed Tinapa.<br/></a>
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note In English text.
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Saqueton, Oscar P., author.
9 (RLIN) 13328
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Soberano, Jinecis T., author.
9 (RLIN) 13329
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Merced, Caridad S., adviser.
9 (RLIN) 10334
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Burton, Ruth Angeli L., technical critic.
9 (RLIN) 13330
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Koha item type Thesis/Manuscripts/Dissertations
Call number prefix UM
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Collection code Permanent location Current location Shelving location Date acquired Coded location qualifier Total Checkouts Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
          Thesis/Manuscript/Dissertation Cavite State University - CCAT Campus Cavite State University - CCAT Campus TH 07/22/2015 UM   T00083 06/01/2024 1 06/01/2024 Thesis/Manuscripts/Dissertations

Powered by Koha