000 -LEADER |
fixed length control field |
02223nam a22002177a 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
control field |
OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
control field |
20240601012930.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
240601b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
Language of cataloging |
English. |
Transcribing agency |
CvSU-CCAT Campus Library. |
Description conventions |
rda. |
050 ## - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER |
Classification number |
|
Item number |
|
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
Personal name |
Vianne Joie H. Javier, author. |
9 (RLIN) |
13257 |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
Title |
Effects of Different Types of Soil In Euphorbia Propogation / |
Statement of responsibility, etc. |
Vianne Joie H. Javier. |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. |
Rosario, Cavite : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. |
Cavite State University-CCAT Campus, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2008 |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
Extent |
xii, 27 leaves : |
Other physical details |
illustrations ; |
Dimensions |
28 cm |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
General note |
Research Paper (LSHS)--Cavite State University-CCAT Campus, 2008. |
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
Bibliography, etc. note |
Includes bibliographical references and appendices. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Thesis Abstract |
<a href="JAVIER, VIANNE JOIE H., Laboratory Science High School<br/>Department, Cavite State University Rosario Campus Rosario, Cavite, 2007-2008.<br/>Effects of Different Types of Soil on Euphorbia Propagation .<br/>Adviser: Mrs. Caridad S. Merced<br/><br/><br/>This study entitled Effects of Different Types of Soil in Euphorbia Propagation" was conducted at Teiero Gen. Trias. Cavite from March, September-October 2007 with the following objectives (1) determine the effects of different types of soil in Euphorbia Propagation, (2) Determine if euphorbia<br/>can live in different types of soil. RCBD (Randomized Complete Block Design) was used in the study with the four treatments and two replications. These were: TO – (100% Loam soil), TI - (50% Loam soil + 50% Sandy soil), T2– (75% Loam soil + 25% Sandy soil), T3- (25% Loam soil + 75% Sandy soil).<br/><br/>Based on the findings with the use of descriptive analysis, in terms of height gained by euphorbia plant, T2 - (75% Loam soil + 25% Sandy soil) was<br/>found to have the great effects in increasing the height of Euphorbia, on the other hand, plants under TO- (100% Loam soil) have highest increase in the number of leaves. ANOVA table showed that there is no significant difference among the treatments in the height gained and the number of leaves. The results showed that the different kinds of soil had no significant effect on the growth of Euphorbia, and the operational hypothesis was accepted.">JAVIER, VIANNE JOIE H., Laboratory Science High School<br/>Department, Cavite State University Rosario Campus Rosario, Cavite, 2007-2008.<br/>Effects of Different Types of Soil on Euphorbia Propagation .<br/>Adviser: Mrs. Caridad S. Merced<br/><br/><br/>This study entitled Effects of Different Types of Soil in Euphorbia Propagation" was conducted at Teiero Gen. Trias. Cavite from March, September-October 2007 with the following objectives (1) determine the effects of different types of soil in Euphorbia Propagation, (2) Determine if euphorbia<br/>can live in different types of soil. RCBD (Randomized Complete Block Design) was used in the study with the four treatments and two replications. These were: TO – (100% Loam soil), TI - (50% Loam soil + 50% Sandy soil), T2– (75% Loam soil + 25% Sandy soil), T3- (25% Loam soil + 75% Sandy soil).<br/><br/>Based on the findings with the use of descriptive analysis, in terms of height gained by euphorbia plant, T2 - (75% Loam soil + 25% Sandy soil) was<br/>found to have the great effects in increasing the height of Euphorbia, on the other hand, plants under TO- (100% Loam soil) have highest increase in the number of leaves. ANOVA table showed that there is no significant difference among the treatments in the height gained and the number of leaves. The results showed that the different kinds of soil had no significant effect on the growth of Euphorbia, and the operational hypothesis was accepted.</a> |
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
Language note |
In English text. |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
Source of classification or shelving scheme |
|
Koha item type |
Thesis/Manuscripts/Dissertations |